This is the mail archive of the libc-help@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: random performance of sem_post function


On 01/05/2013 08:43 AM, Maury, Olivier wrote:
> I'm using RHEL 6.2 64 bits on a regular intel nehalem server. I also
> have that behavior on Centos 5.3 with the same kind of HW. I'll try
> oprofile, I never used it so I hope it doesn't require root
> privileges as I don't have any. I tried intel Vtune and perf but
> wasn't able to see anything interesting (just like the sem_post
> function wasn't taking any CPU time) but I must say there are lots of
> HW counters I don't know how to use.
> 
> Could it be possible to control the behavior of the syscall function
> ? Because the executable that shows that issue is also linked with
> some code I've no control on.

Start by using strace -ff -ttt to get timings for everything, and 
then look at how long the syscalls took and if that relates in 
any way to the behaviour you're seeing.

Cheers,
Carlos.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]