Re: building glibc 2.15

[Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>]

On Friday 23 March 2012 15:58:23 Allin Cottrell wrote:
> Thanks. Given the "check" failures I thought I'd try using
> slightly more conservative kernel headers -- 3.2.12 instead of
> 3.3. Now make check gives fewer fails: just tst-mqueue5 and
> check-localplt. The messages are
> 
> tst-mqueue5.out:
> SIGRTMIN signal in child did not arrive
> child failed with status 256
> 
> check-localplt.out:
> --- ../scripts/data/localplt-i386-linux-gnu.data
> 2012-01-01 07:16:32.000000000 -0500
> +++ -   2012-03-23 15:26:52.785977398 -0400
> @@ -4,4 +4,5 @@
>   libc.so: malloc
>   libc.so: memalign
>   libc.so: realloc
> +libm.so: feraiseexcept
>   libm.so: matherr
> 
> Any judgment on whether these are things to worry about?

should be fine.  the 2nd failure shouldn't cause any runtime bugs, but it is 
something that should be looked at in latest git if no one has.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.