This is the mail archive of the libc-help@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: vi and glibc 2.12: Assertion `_rtld_global_ro._dl_pagesize != 0


On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@maven.pl> wrote:
> On Friday 21 of May 2010, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@maven.pl>
> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 13 of May 2010, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>> >> With glibc 2.12 vi (from vim 7.2.422) started dying here with:
>> >>
>> >> 188679 write(2, "vi: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/getpagesize.c:32:
>> >> __getpagesize: Assertion `_rtld_global_ro._dl_pagesize != 0' failed.\n",
>> >> 118) = 118
>> >>
>> >> Vim: Caught deadly signal ABRT
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone seen this?
>> >
>> > Simple reproducer for:
>> >
>> > [arekm@carme-pld ~]$ ./a.out
>> > a.out: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/getpagesize.c:32: __getpagesize:
>> > Assertion `_rtld_global_ro._dl_pagesize != 0' failed.
>> >
>> > [arekm@carme-pld ~]$ cat a.c
>> > #include <sys/types.h>
>> > #include <pwd.h>
>> > int main() {
>> >
>> > ? ? ? ?getpwnam("root");
>> > ? ? ? ?return 0;
>> > }
>> >
>> > [arekm@carme-pld ~]$ gcc a.c -static
>> > /home/users/arekm/tmp/ccedPM2o.o: In function `main':
>> > a.c:(.text+0xa): warning: Using 'getpwnam' in statically linked
>> > applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc
>> > version used for linking
>> > [arekm@carme-pld ~]$ ./a.out
>> > a.out: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/getpagesize.c:32: __getpagesize:
>> > Assertion `_rtld_global_ro._dl_pagesize != 0' failed.
>> > zsh: abort ? ? ?./a.out
>> > [arekm@carme-pld ~]$ gcc --version
>> > gcc (PLD-Linux) 4.5.0 20100520 (release)
>> > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. ?There is
>> > NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>> > PURPOSE.
>>
>> I have no problem with glibc 2.12 on Linux/ia32
>> and Linux/Intel64. Can you try gcc 4.4.4 instead of
>> gcc 4.5.0?
>
> Could you try the same reproducer but with nscd stopped? It segfaults only if
> nscd is not running.
>

I don't run nscd at all.


-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]