This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Don't require DNS labels to be host names

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at redhat dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>
Cc: libc-hacker at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:42:31 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't require DNS labels to be host names
References: <m34oc9869t.fsf@hase.home><AANLkTikbvqeKtTfLN-FURcyfeqf82k2zxh_OQYb7a3LW@mail.gmail.com><m3zku16kvl.fsf@hase.home><AANLkTinDp=gFfmReJLCRUKjGErdX8SOWVtkKm+ibP+-+@mail.gmail.com>

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com> writes:

> Invalid extensions by msft

What does this have to do with msft?

> Therefore the question: how did you come up with the patch?

By fixing the bug described in the bug report.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84  5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- [PATCH] Don't require DNS labels to be host names
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] Don't require DNS labels to be host names
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] Don't require DNS labels to be host names
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] Don't require DNS labels to be host names
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]