This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: symbol bloat for fortify warnings

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
Cc: libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:02:37 -0800
Subject: Re: symbol bloat for fortify warnings
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <200502250246.j1P2kw0J026108@magilla.sf.frob.com>

This nop function will work for this special case, and I agree, it
should be used.

But it is no general solution.  For instance, there is a related test
which I have not yet implemented.  If the second memset parameter is >
255, the called function cannot be a no-op and should not be in
libc_nonshared.

--
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: symbol bloat for fortify warnings
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]