This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: patch lost?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:28:43PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:05:40 -0800, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> said:
> 
>   Roland> If you want to keep track of something, use bugzilla.
> 
> I see somebody already created a bugzilla bug-report for this issue:
> 
>   http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=461
> 
> May I ask why it is taking so long (almost two months already) to get
> such a seemingly simple patches into glibc?  Is there something
> controversial in the patch?

I am afraid that there is another gcc bug which has to be fixed first:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18153

My patch is still waiting for review. Otherwise, many DSOs from glibc
will depend on libunwind.so.7 which isn't used at all.


H.J.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]