This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: INTERNAL_SYSCALL and function calls in arguments

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> Since the change only introduces temporary variables which the compiler
>> would create internally anyway, the compiler is perfectly capable to
>> optimize them away, and in all cases except sched_setaffinity the
>> generated code is virtually identical.
>
> I haven't asked about theoretical results.  You must assume I'm stupid
> and don't know that this is possible.  What are the concrete results?

As I wrote above: virtually identical.  In some cases even better.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]