This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes: |> --- libc/linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/vfork.S.jj 2003-01-09 15:27:26.000000000 -0500 |> +++ libc/linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/vfork.S 2003-02-06 13:31:43.000000000 -0500 |> @@ -31,7 +31,19 @@ ENTRY (__vfork) |> |> #ifdef __NR_vfork |> |> - SINGLE_THREAD_P |> +# ifdef SHARED |> +# if !defined HAVE_HIDDEN || !USE___THREAD |> + SETUP_PIC_REG (cx) |> +# else |> + call __i686.get_pc_thunk.cx |> +# endif |> + addl $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, %ecx |> + cmpl $0, __libc_pthread_functions@GOTOFF(%ecx) |> +# else |> + .weak __pthread_fork |> + movl $__pthread_fork, %eax |> + testl %eax, %eax |> +# endif |> jne HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET (__fork) |> |> /* Pop the return PC value into ECX. */ Shouldn't that be moved outside of #ifdef __NR_vfork, so that __fork is used even if compiling with kernel headers that do not define vfork? The minimum for i386 is still 2.0.10. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |