This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> BTW: It seems to work just fine if stack_addr passed to clone > is at least 8*16 bytes below end of particular mmaped area > (this is on s390x). My wild guess is that the register save > area is needed, which means clone.S should subtract 8*16 > resp. 8*8 (on s390-32) bytes from stack_pointer before doing > the syscall. Grr, it's the new clone implementation that stores %r6 on the stack. It reloads it after the svc because the father has to return with an unmodified %r6. But the restore of %r6 may not be done in the child! Four letter words again. Try to move the "lg %r6,48(%r15)" in clone.S after the two branches just before the "br %r14". That should do the trick. blue skies, Martin
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |