This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Crash in DT_FINI_ARRAY


What platform did it crash on?  I'm sure I tested it on ia64 and it
worked fine, there (at least it got through the test-suite without
visible errors).

	--david

>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:08:20 +0100, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> said:

  Andreas> The pointers in DT_FINI_ARRAY are already relocated.
  Andreas> Andreas.

  Andreas> 2003-01-23 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>

  Andreas> 	* elf/dl-close.c (_dl_close): Don't relocate
  Andreas> DT_FINI_ARRAY elements.

  Andreas> --- elf/dl-close.c.~1.93.~ 2003-01-16 11:19:32.000000000
  Andreas> +0100 +++ elf/dl-close.c 2003-01-22 21:11:29.000000000
  Andreas> +0100 @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ _dl_close (void *_map) unsigned
  Andreas> int cnt;
 
  Andreas>  		  for (cnt = 0; cnt < sz; ++cnt) - ((fini_t)
  Andreas> (imap->l_addr + array[cnt])) (); + ((fini_t) array[cnt])
  Andreas> (); }
 
  Andreas>  	      /* Next try the old-style destructor.  */

  Andreas> -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG,
  Andreas> Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint =
  Andreas> 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now
  Andreas> for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]