This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: missing libc_hidden_proto() declarations?

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
Cc: libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:16:14 +0100
Subject: Re: missing libc_hidden_proto() declarations?
References: <200301140657.h0E6vtSD023888@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:57:55PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> I had to declare if_nametoindex() and if_indextoname() with
> libc_hidden_proto() to get libc to compile on ia64 linux (with
> gcc-pre3.4).  Since this seems to work for others, perhaps I'm doing
> something wrong?

libc/include/net/if.h has:
#ifndef _NET_IF_H

# include_next <net/if.h>

libc_hidden_proto (if_nametoindex)
libc_hidden_proto (if_indextoname)

#endif

which should take care of this.
So you should investigate why include/net/if.h has not been included.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: missing libc_hidden_proto() declarations?
  - From: David Mosberger

References:
- missing libc_hidden_proto() declarations?
  - From: David Mosberger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]