This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Is there some policy or guiding principle behind what goes into locale.alias? I have no interest in being the arbiter of what the canonical aliases for various locales should be. But I don't know how to respond to bug reports or change requests about the locale.alias contents we ship in the libc sources. I guess the answer I'd like best is that for each locale there is some responsible entity that decides what's right (or one entity for all, whatever), and that entity decides the canonical alias names too. I have no problem deciding what's right for en_US, these 300 million other losers notwithstanding ;-). But for the general case I want an easily-identifiable recipient to pass the buck to. Thanks, Roland
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |