This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
>>>>> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:59:42 -0700, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> said: Uli> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Uli> David Mosberger wrote: >> Linus *has* made a final decision. Those syscalls were added >> upon his explicit request. Go back and check the mail archives. Uli> Read the current discussions. I did (assuming you're referring to the shared page table discussion; see http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=E1844h3-0002Bt-00%40w-gerrit2&rnum=4&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dben%2Blahaise%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26scoring%3Dd%26selm%3DE1844h3-0002Bt-00%2540w-gerrit2%26rnum%3D4). There is nothing new there. Now if you'd read the original discussion, you'd see that Linus considered those objections and still preferred separate system calls. You have to realize that the huge page syscalls are NOT a replacement for transparent superpages. They serve a different purpose and have a different scope (we're talking about pages of the size of 256MB and more, not merely something that's a small multiple of the base page size). Please apply the patch. --david
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |