This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] pathconf and XFS/Reiserfs link count

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak at suse dot de>
Cc: libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:36:55 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pathconf and XFS/Reiserfs link count
References: <200210170012.g9H0CkA28740@magilla.sf.frob.com> <3DAE024B.9010800@redhat.com> <20021017022815.A32174@wotan.suse.de>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andi Kleen wrote:

> Just curious: why is it no option ?


Because libc wouldn't be self-contained.  That non-obvious file missing
could cause problems for the entire system.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9rgYn2ijCOnn/RHQRAk5fAJ0b50PxLLtAKTKfmrgXVkCurry/DgCgysfu
89czPKF1Dg1NBMt9JiW+5RE=
=QAQP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [PATCH] pathconf and XFS/Reiserfs link count
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH] pathconf and XFS/Reiserfs link count
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]