This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 08:52:35AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > It certainly works fine for me, but I am not using the same tools. >> > I am using GCC 3.2 with RH modifications and binutils is also a RH version. >> >> I just tried it with newer binutils (2.12.90.0.15 20020717) and that >> worked fine. We might need to document the minimal supported binutils >> version. > > Ours is binutils 2.13.90.0.2. Well, we need to find out the oldest > binutils which worked ok and also write a binutils testcase whcih will > ensure this will work right from now on. I can easily test this with my old and broken binutils (2.12.90.0.4 20020408) but so far I didn't fully grab the problem and how a testcase might look. > I think it is an useful feature to be able to access a compat-only variable > (and getting to it through aliases doesn't work because of COPY relocs). Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |