This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Support more than 1024 threads

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>, Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:15:45 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFC] Support more than 1024 threads
References: <20020808235952.E18963@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <3D52F10C.70104@redhat.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 03:30:36PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Is there any reason why this shouldn't work (ie. does somebody
> > use __pthread_handles before __pthread_initialize_minimal)?
> > Testing still in progress.
> 
> Well, test using gdb.  I fixed several problems in this area yesterday 
> and before but who knows.

Works just fine (of course provided gdb is pointed
to the right linuxthreads_db if the glibc is not installed yet).
make check passed too.
Will do some more checks to see whether libpthread
memory usage increased because of this (comparing /proc/statm for this version,
version without this patch and version with this patch but
with PTHREAD_THREADS_MAX 1024).

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Support more than 1024 threads
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [RFC] Support more than 1024 threads
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [RFC] Support more than 1024 threads
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]