This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 05:19:35PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:58:52 -0800, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> said: > > HJ> I am not sure if .init_array/.fini_array are supported. It will > HJ> be nice to add them to binutils. > > >From my point of view, it's more worthwhile to spend time on getting > .init_array/.fini_array supported than trying to fix up .init/.fini. > I'm willing to help with such an effort, but I probably would need a > fair amount of help (or at least support) from the glibc and binutils > maintainers. Anyone else willing to help with this? > I believe glibc is ok. The problem is binutils. I didn't see any supports for DT_INIT_ARRAY, DT_FINI_ARRAY. DT_INIT_ARRAYSZ, DT_FINI_ARRAYSZ, DT_PREINIT_ARRAY nor DT_PREINIT_ARRAYSZ. H.J.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |