This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] A little do-rel.h fix (take 2)

To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] A little do-rel.h fix (take 2)
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 24 Aug 2001 09:52:11 -0700
Cc: Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
References: <20010824181628.O5765@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><m3y9o9qvoc.fsf@otr.mynet><20010824184850.P5765@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> But I was especially interested in the r = endrel; line since that matters
> even for non-prelinked binaries (there are couple dozens of RELATIVE relocs
> in ld.so).

Yep, will add this.  In slightly different form.  But first I have to
see why I get segfaults in _dl_start now.  I've rebuild everything and
it doesn't work unless I ignore RELCOUNT.  Very strange.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

References:
- [PATCH] A little do-rel.h fix
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] A little do-rel.h fix
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- [PATCH] A little do-rel.h fix (take 2)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]