This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: more testing needed

To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: more testing needed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:12:22 +0200
Cc: GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <m3ae2rg3or.fsf@otr.mynet>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 12:12:20AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I'm currently quite satisfied with the status on x86.  But I don't
> know much about the status on other machines.  About a week ago I
> tried Alpha and had a problem in the test suite.  Haven't tried IA-64.
> And there are some PPC patches outstanding (one from Andreas, the
> other by Franz).

I think libgcc_s.so.1 vs. GLIBC needs to be resolved, see my mail in
`GCC 3.0 and GLIBC don't work together' thread on libc-alpha.
I think glibc 2.2.4 should be compilable by GCC 3.0 now when it is released.
Before I hack something, I'd like to know what you and other folks think is
best (so far I have just heard from H.J.).

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: more testing needed
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: more testing needed
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- more testing needed
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]