This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes: > Hi! > > Now that gcc defines __NO_INLINE__ unless -O1+ was used and no -fno-inline was > specified, here is a patch to actually use it in glibc, so that -O2 -fno-inline > #include <string.h> > work. > Alternatively, the ctype/stdlib/wchar checks could be replaced by simple > #ifdef __USE_EXTERN_INLINES, since the other conditions are guarded in > features.h (and anyone who uses -D__USE_EXTERN_INLINES with -fno-inline or > -O1 and up just deserves what he wanted). If you'd like me to prepare this > variant of the patch, just let me know. IMO that variant would be the cleaner solution, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |