This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Compiling glibc gives these warnings: wcfuncs.c:39: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswalnum' wcfuncs.c:41: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswalpha' wcfuncs.c:43: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswblank' wcfuncs.c:45: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswcntrl' wcfuncs.c:47: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswdigit' wcfuncs.c:49: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswlower' wcfuncs.c:51: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswgraph' wcfuncs.c:53: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswprint' wcfuncs.c:55: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswpunct' wcfuncs.c:59: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswupper' wcfuncs.c:61: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswxdigit' Why do we need the __iswalnum declarations at all? Shouldn't we declare them directly as iswalnum without using aliases? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |