This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: struct gmon_cg_arc_record

To: Jes Sorensen <jes at linuxcare dot com>
Subject: Re: struct gmon_cg_arc_record
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:28:38 +0100
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>, libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <200011141926.UAA20529@lxplus015.cern.ch> <m3ofzis52d.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <d3r94eux9b.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> <m3aeb2s33g.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <d3n1f2uvxu.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> <m34s1as27q.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <d3itpquuhv.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 10:14:04PM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Two questions, how will the latter affect architectures like the x86?
> Second what about Sparc64/MIPS64/PPC64? Do you guys have profile
> support running already that will break from this?

Nobody uses profiling on sparc64 yet (well, libc_p.a builds on it but I
haven't ever tried to profile a 64bit sparc app yet and I doubt Ben Collins
did). And I think mips64 and ppc64 have still more to go than sparc64.

	Jakub

References:
- struct gmon_cg_arc_record
  - From: Jes Sorensen
- Re: struct gmon_cg_arc_record
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: struct gmon_cg_arc_record
  - From: Jes Sorensen
- Re: struct gmon_cg_arc_record
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: struct gmon_cg_arc_record
  - From: Jes Sorensen
- Re: struct gmon_cg_arc_record
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: struct gmon_cg_arc_record
  - From: Jes Sorensen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]