This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
>>>>> "HJ" == H J Lu <hjl@lucon.org> writes: HJ> On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:16:22AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> You claim in your patch that the logic was wrong - could you try >> and explain what was actually wrong instead of just saying >> something was wrong? It's somewhat hard to judge a patch if you >> don't try and tell us what it is trying to solve. HJ> Have you tried to fix all those "make check" failures under ia64? Not recently, I normally run make tests - however my point was that when you post a bug report it would be much more productive if you wrote something like 'wrong bits masked resulting in bleh not being enabled' instead of just 'logic is wrong'. With the latter one can read you patch and actually see what you're trying to fix which is not always obvious the other way 'round. Jes
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |