This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 06:37:18PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 08:45:19 -0700 > From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 03:19:33PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > The Austin draft clearly states that (2.3 Error Numbers): > > > > The value of errno should only be examined when it is indicated to > > be valid by a function's return value. > > > > I assume that this is equivalent to what the current POSIX standard > > says. > > > > Since fcntl is not an ISO C function, its current behaviour is > > perfectly fine, and elm isn't a POSIX conforming application and > > should be fixed. > > Please remember many ISO C functions in glibc may call fcntl (). What do you want to do with them? H.J.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |