This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: glibc 2.1.91 based distributions :-(.

To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Subject: Re: glibc 2.1.91 based distributions :-(.
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:55:04 +0200
Cc: GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <u83dkql3yn.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 05:22:24PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> 
> Hi Uli,
> 
> we should release the current glibc version now as final version.
> I've just read another announcement where a beta distribution is
> announced that uses glibc 2.1.91.  It seems that glibc 2.1.91 is very
> stable and as bug free as 2.1.3.
> 
> Andreas
> 
> P.S.: I'm not serious, just a wee bit pissed off.  It seems that some
> people can't read the configure output.  Please add smiles
> appropriatly.

What's your suggested way of testing things sufficiently so that glibc 2.2
can be a reality soonish?
I think a Beta distribution is a very good way how to get thousands of
testers (which would not give it a shot otherwise) to test it.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.1.91 based distributions :-(.
  - From: Thorsten Kukuk
- Re: glibc 2.1.91 based distributions :-(.
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

References:
- glibc 2.1.91 based distributions :-(.
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]