This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
>>>>> Jakub Jelinek writes: Jakub> On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 12:49:10PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> >>>>> Jakub Jelinek writes: >> >> > Hi! >> > cookie_seek_function_t type changed between 2.0 and 2.2, which causes binary >> > incompatibility between programs using fopencookie compiled with glibc up to >> > 2.1.x and glibc 2.2. >> > This patch should add fopencookie@@GLIBC_2.2 and fopencookie@GLIBC_2.0, so >> > that old programs can continue to work. >> > +#ifdef weak_alias >> > +compat_symbol (libc, _IO_old_fopencookie, fopencookie, GLIBC_2_0); >> > +#endif >> Is the #ifdef really needed? I don't think so. >> >> I'll check the patch in without this if this is ok. Uli, what do you >> think? Jakub> That was cut'n'paste from oldiof[gs]etpos*, so if it is not needed here, it Jakub> is not needed there either (and I assume it is not needed because e.g. Jakub> oldiofclose.c does not have it). It should not be needed because of the definition of weak_alias in include/libc-symbols.h. It's either a weak alias or a strong_alias. I think the #ifdef can also be removed from oldiof[gs]etpos*. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |