This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: NL_TEXTMAX == INT_MAX?


On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 08:59:32PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote:
> 
> > Yes, it may be reasonable, which I doubt, for 64bit machines if you
> > have enough memory and/or swap space. But I won't call it reasonable
> > for 32bit machines. If you think it is reasonable, try to generate such
> > a message on both 64bit and 32bit machines.
> 
> So you think that NL_TEXTMAX should be modified at runtime to the
> amount of free VM on the machine?

I don't care as long as I could create a message of NL_TEXTMAX byte
long.


H.J.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]