This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> > > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:51:30 -0700 (PDT) > > From: hjl@varesearch.com (H.J. Lu) > > > +ifeq ("",$(tests-static)) > > +built-program-cmd = $(run-built-program-cmd) > > +else > > +define built-program-cmd > > + $(shell if [ x$(findstring $(notdir $(built-program-file)), \ > > + $(tests-static)) = x ]; \ > > + then echo $(run-built-program-cmd); \ > > + else echo $(built-program-file); fi) > > +endef > > +endif # tests-static > > No! > > Just create a _new_ rule, which _only_ knows how to run static > programs. Don't try to make the existing rule, which is for running > non-static programs, do both jobs. I couldn't find a better way. Wrong, the existing rule uses $(built-program-cmd) which can handle static or dynamic, but not both. > > Would you try to create a rule which knew how to build a .a library > and build a .so library? > > I find it particularly ugly that this is going to cause an additional > shell invocation for every program executed. > I take you will define "tests-static" in every Makefile. Otherwise, what you said won't happen. -- H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |