This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:51:30 -0700 (PDT) > From: hjl@varesearch.com (H.J. Lu) > +ifeq ("",$(tests-static)) > +built-program-cmd = $(run-built-program-cmd) > +else > +define built-program-cmd > + $(shell if [ x$(findstring $(notdir $(built-program-file)), \ > + $(tests-static)) = x ]; \ > + then echo $(run-built-program-cmd); \ > + else echo $(built-program-file); fi) > +endef > +endif # tests-static No! Just create a _new_ rule, which _only_ knows how to run static programs. Don't try to make the existing rule, which is for running non-static programs, do both jobs. Would you try to create a rule which knew how to build a .a library and build a .so library? I find it particularly ugly that this is going to cause an additional shell invocation for every program executed. -- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |