This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> > hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) writes: > > > I don't like this new behavior in return values at all. Why not return > > -errno? Is that because some functions may return unsigned int? > > Again, read the standard. It has to be the error value. > Where is the standard? Is that final? The standard is made up by people. As I said, I don't like it as what you said it was. I don't believe I am the only one who finds it confusing. -- H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |