This is the mail archive of the
libc-hacker@cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.0.111
- To: Dominik Kubla <dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de>
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.0.111
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@sekiya.twics.co.jp>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:09:25 +0900 (JST)
- cc: GNU libc testers <libc-alpha@cygnus.com>
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Dominik Kubla wrote:
> But the regression tests failed in math/test-fenv... (see attached output)
This is what I saw last week. I think that the math routines need to do:
if (ptr != NULL)
if (ptr[0] != '\0') {
...
}
... instead of
if (ptr[0] != '\0') {
...
}
(sorry about the vagueness, the box in question is at home and I won't be
able to see it for another couple of days)
Further, did dependencies get screwed up in 2.0.111? A make install
rebuilds significant portions of the tree. I've seen this on three
machines now.
-- Chris (wileyc@sekiya.twics.co.jp)