This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]


On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, H.J. Lu wrote:

> > Btw. I've seen some reports which indicated failure of glibc together
> > with Linux 2.1.126.  I'd really appreciate if somebody could tell me
> > if Linux 2.1.126 is broken or glibc2.
> > 
> 
> I cannot even boot Linux 2.1.126 on my Pentium 133. I saw some people
> report the same thing.

I had the same behavior with 126pre2, I never built 126 final. Linus
posted a 127pre1, which builds cleanly and boots fine... Compiled with
egcs built from recent cvs tree. Haven't tried glibc 2.0.99 though, I
usually hop all over the new releases but I'm waiting on the bug reports
to boil down to something substantial before trying this one :)

-- 
     +--------------------------+----------------------------------------+
     | by-tor@by-tor.tacorp.net | UNIX _is_ user-friendly. It's just not |
     |       By-Tor@EfNet       | ignorant-friendly and idiot-friendly.  |
     +--------------------------+----------------------------------------+



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]