This is the mail archive of the
libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
- To: libc-alpha@cygnus.com
- Subject: Re: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
- From: Wes Morgan <by-tor@by-tor.tacorp.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 14:07:22 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Btw. I've seen some reports which indicated failure of glibc together
> > with Linux 2.1.126. I'd really appreciate if somebody could tell me
> > if Linux 2.1.126 is broken or glibc2.
> >
>
> I cannot even boot Linux 2.1.126 on my Pentium 133. I saw some people
> report the same thing.
I had the same behavior with 126pre2, I never built 126 final. Linus
posted a 127pre1, which builds cleanly and boots fine... Compiled with
egcs built from recent cvs tree. Haven't tried glibc 2.0.99 though, I
usually hop all over the new releases but I'm waiting on the bug reports
to boil down to something substantial before trying this one :)
--
+--------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| by-tor@by-tor.tacorp.net | UNIX _is_ user-friendly. It's just not |
| By-Tor@EfNet | ignorant-friendly and idiot-friendly. |
+--------------------------+----------------------------------------+