This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] nptl: Add C11 threads thrd_* functions



On 08/02/2018 11:49, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
> I have only a few, minor comments.
> 
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2018, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> 
>> -/* We do not support C11 <threads.h>.  */
>> -#define __STDC_NO_THREADS__		1
> 
> I don't know if that actually matters, but should you wait until the other
> patches in this series (at least patch 2) are in before removing this
> definition?
>

I do not have a strong opinion about when to remove __STDC_NO_THREADS__, since
my idea is first get all patches reviewed and acked before actually commit then.

 
>> +int
>> +thrd_sleep (const struct timespec* time_point, struct timespec* remaining)
>> +{
>> +  /* It calls the syscalls directly to avoid cancellable version.  */
>> +  INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL (err);
>> +  int ret = INTERNAL_SYSCALL_CALL (nanosleep, err, time_point, remaining);
>> +  if (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (ret, err))
>> +    {
>> +      /* C11 states thrd_sleep function returns -1 if it has been interrupted
>> +         by a signal, or a negative value if it fails.  */
>   ~~~~~~~~~
> This hunk did not apply with git am, because there are more than 8 spaces.

Thanks, I fixed it locally (I also keep my user branch in sync [1]).

> 
>> +/* Detach the thread identified by __THR from the current environment
>> +   (tt does not allow join or wait for it).  */
>       ~~
> Did you mean "it"?  Or is "tt" something else that I did not understand.
> 

It should be 'it', fixed it locally.

[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/azanella/c11-threads


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]