This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: RFC: remove the "tile" architecture from glibc
- From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:29:01 -0200
- Subject: Re: RFC: remove the "tile" architecture from glibc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1a57be83-3349-5450-ee4f-d2a33569a728@mellanox.com> <d6c8e425-a6b6-6594-05e3-965536f06da3@physik.fu-berlin.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712012159490.15078@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <995aac59-2f9d-2a6a-2b5c-b827410ad295@physik.fu-berlin.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801311732001.23883@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <38170271-e17f-0a7e-7dd2-06fa6ddfae62@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On 31/01/2018 16:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 01/31/2018 06:37 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> The 2.27 release is due out tomorrow. So far, no test results for tile
>> have been posted at <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.27> - and
>> the same applies to sh and ia64, which also had some interest in them
>> expressed in this thread. Are you, or other people you're working with
>> who have interest in those architectures, working on having results for
>> those architectures for 2.27 for the wiki page (regenerating libm test
>> ulps first and getting that regeneration checked in if there would
>> otherwise be tests failing only because of lack of updated ulps)?
>
> I don't have access to tile hardware at the moment, but sh4 and ia64.
>
> Adhemerval has access to the sparc64, sh4 and ia64 boxes as well and
> he said he would be working on the ia64 stuff.
I will work on ia64 and sh4 results this week.