This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Possible additional Bugzilla components


On 01/26/2018 01:10 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> 
>> On 01/24/2018 08:57 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>> Looking at the large number of miscellaneous open bugs in the "libc" 
>>> component, I'd like to suggest a few more possible Bugzilla components for 
>>> distinct groups of those bugs:
>>>
>>> argparse - Command-line argument parsing (argp and getopt)
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>> crypt - libcrypt and related cryptographic functionality
>>
>> Agreed.
> 
> I've now created those components, and moved 10 bugs to argparse and 7 to 
> crypt.
> 
> I do not know whether any of the bugs in argparse have fixes already 
> available in the gnulib code (if they do, we'd probably still want to add 
> glibc testcases when merging such fixes from gnulib).
> 
> FWIW, the numbers of open bugs by component are currently:
> 
> libc 204
> dynamic-link 117
> network 103
> nptl 82
> localedata 80
> locale 66
> manual 54
> stdio 53
> build 45
> malloc 41
> math 36
> regex 29
> time 29
> string 19
> nscd 17
> nss 14
> librt 12
> argparse 10
> glob 8
> admin 7
> crypt 7
> nis 6
> hurd 5
> soft-fp 2
> buildbot 1
> 
> and while there may be more groups that could meaningfully be split out of 
> "libc", I don't see any likely scope for such splits of the other 
> components with many open bugs.
 
Agreed.

Review of libc might reveal more useful splitting for triage.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]