This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v3] New generic cosf


On 12/07/2017 11:59 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> The same logic used in s_cosf.S version for x86 and powerpc
>> is used to create a generic s_cosf.c, so there is no performance
>> improvement in x86_64 and powerpc64.
>>
>> 2017-12-06  Paul A. Clarke  <pc@us.ibm.com>
>>
>>         * sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32/s_cosf.c: New implementation.
> 
> Please take a look at sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32/math_config.h to see how
> to share constants between s_cosf.c and s_sinf.c.

I interpreted Joseph's response to your earlier suggestion of the same as it to be acceptable to common these tables and constants into a future submission of a combined sinf/cosf/sincosf.

Raji is looking into that approach.

As for cosf, I figured committing a good cosf now is better than waiting for a perfect sinf/cosf/sincosf.  Unless there are strong objections?

(FYI, for some reason, I'm not receiving my own posts back to my inbox, so I have been unable to reply to them.  This seems like a recent change in behavior.)

PC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]