This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 11/14/2017 02:10 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
+static int +do_test (void) +{ + sigjmp_buf sj; + struct support_next_to_fault sigset_t_buf + = support_next_to_fault_allocate (SIZEOF_SIGSET_T); + sigset_t *m_p = (sigset_t *) sigset_t_buf.buffer; + sigset_t m; + + sigemptyset (&m); + memcpy (m_p, &m, SIZEOF_SIGSET_T); + sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK, m_p, NULL); + memcpy (&m, m_p, SIZEOF_SIGSET_T); + if (sigsetjmp (sj, 0) == 0) + { + sigaddset (&m, SIGUSR1); + memcpy (m_p, &m, SIZEOF_SIGSET_T); + sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK, m_p, NULL); + memcpy (&m, m_p, SIZEOF_SIGSET_T); + siglongjmp (sj, 1); + return EXIT_FAILURE; + } + sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK, NULL, m_p); + memcpy (&m, m_p, SIZEOF_SIGSET_T); + return sigismember (&m, SIGUSR1) ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE; +}
Sorry, I don't understand anymore what this test is supposed to test and how.
To be honest, I don't like how you inject the internal definition of jmp_buf. Is this the way we do it for the nptl types?
I think you should check _JUMP_BUF_SIGSET_NSIG against a kernel constant (_NSIGS?) somewhere.
Thanks, Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |