This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 5/6] Optimize sighold implementation

From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:05:49 -0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Optimize sighold implementation
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <1509745249-11404-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <1509745249-11404-5-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <CAKCAbMhmE42z2E_m8F_y4w5ka3SVhKXF==iFZcyQ0nHyhvCEHw@mail.gmail.com>


On 05/11/2017 17:15, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:41 PM Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org <mailto:adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>> wrote:
> 
>     This patch simplifies sighold a bit by removing an extra sigprocmask
>     and using SIG_BLOCK (which union of the current set and the set argument).
> 
> LGtM. Might a similar improvement be possible for sigrelse?

Indeed, I will sent it along the patch refactor asked by Joseph on 2/6.

References:
- [PATCH 1/6] Consolidate Linux sigprocmask implementation (BZ #22391)
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- [PATCH 5/6] Optimize sighold implementation
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] Optimize sighold implementation
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]