This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gabriel at inconstante dot eti dot br>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, libc-stable at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:13:47 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Authentication-results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=fweimer at redhat dot com
Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 3CAD2C047B66
References: <20170912123435.6592-1-gabriel@inconstante.eti.br> <20170921183123.48a82e7c@keller.br.ibm.com>

On 09/21/2017 11:31 PM, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:

Thanks for all the reviews in this patch set.
I just pushed them.

I need to backport these patches to ibm/2.26/master.  Usually, I backport
the patches to release/2.26/master first, then merge into ibm/2.26/master.

Is it fine to backport the patches to release/2.26/master, this time?  Even
if they do not fix bugs in bugzilla?  I believe it could benefit other
distros.

If I understand our situation correctly, we want these patches in Fedora27, so backporting them to the stable release branch would be helpful(so that we'll pick them up automatically).


Thanks,
Florian

References:
- [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default
  - From: Gabriel F. T. Gomes
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default
  - From: Gabriel F. T. Gomes

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]