This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2] Removed redundant data for LC_MONETARY


Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> さんはかきました:

> * Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho:
>
>> mon_grouping is different than what hi_IN defines.
>
>> Both p_sep_by_space and n_sep_by_space values were different than what
>> hi_IN defines.
>>
>> These changes are causing errors at stdlib/tst-strfmon_l.
>
> And to be absolutely clear: This test does not test these locales, but
> it verifies that certain aspects of thread-local locales are properly
> isolated from the process-wide locale object.
>
> If the locales no longer have this property, we can pick another
> locale, or maybe write our own locale for testing purposes.

Thank you, I thought so.

My guess is that these monetary formatting values should be the same all
over India and in that case we should pick another locale to test the
above.

First I am trying to confirm now whether the monetary formatting
is really the same for all of India.

-- 
Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]