This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: A quick architecture status report

From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:59:20 +0000
Subject: Re: A quick architecture status report
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAKCAbMj2RvaJFM8ec7+huEOTCSrUiWV4sv2hK8K_iUJ5q4fEmg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707101115470.22173@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CAKCAbMhq7Ht3FTeuqK3R9JX9eotcmj603CviJVuhd1dqi_TgXw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707101252200.30742@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CAKCAbMi5W_dGvaeMRdvjGrC9b09YK37TkCiyTkqL1F+5TPnpeg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Zack Weinberg wrote:

> Hm, what do you think of this patch?  It makes elf/check-execstack an
> expected failure on any target where the compiler doesn't put
> .note.GNU-stack sections in its output.  (UNSUPPORTED might be more
> appropriate, but I don't see a way to trigger that from a makefile
> conditional.)

It's not clear it *should* be expected unless there's a good 
architecture-specific reason.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A quick architecture status report
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- A quick architecture status report
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: A quick architecture status report
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: A quick architecture status report
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: A quick architecture status report
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: A quick architecture status report
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]