This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] tunables: Add IFUNC selection and cache sizes

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:06:28 +0530
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tunables: Add IFUNC selection and cache sizes
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20170615131042.GA28885@gmail.com> <63707191-601d-9374-8cad-74f15d51f917@linaro.org> <CAMe9rOrBWJVJq2ywbOoJDtAWpW4gAper8vQh3S-GsA9++hhwNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOperCrHviB+PM7m2m11ooYbBqtcA-_AwVAAnxpu4fY+7w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 20 June 2017 07:11 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Since ifunc and others are handled in the same name space, I have to
> make non_temporal_threshold, .. as well as ifunc x86 specific.  Will it be
> OK?

I'm going to add ifunc selection for aarch64 soon, so it makes sense to
have that generic.  You could name the arch-specific tunables as
x86_non_temporal_threshold and so on.

Siddhesh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] tunables: Add IFUNC selection and cache sizes
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] tunables: Add IFUNC selection and cache sizes
  - From: Rodriguez Bahena, Victor

References:
- [PATCH] tunables: Add IFUNC selection and cache sizes
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] tunables: Add IFUNC selection and cache sizes
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: [PATCH] tunables: Add IFUNC selection and cache sizes
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] tunables: Add IFUNC selection and cache sizes
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]