This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 1/4] tunables: Use glibc.tune.hwcap_mask tunable instead of _dl_hwcap_mask
On 30/05/2017 21:30, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 May 2017 02:51 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> On 25/05/2017 17:25, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>>> +
>>> +#include <elf/dl-tunables.h>
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef SHARED
>>> +# if HAVE_TUNABLES
>>> +# define GET_HWCAP_MASK() TUNABLE_GET (glibc, tune, hwcap_mask, uint64_t)
>>> +# else
>>
>> I think this patchset is missing the previous TUNABLE_GET one [1] (build
>> fail with --enable-tunables).
>
> I did not repost 1/5, 2/5 and 4/5 since they were already acked. I can
> post the whole set again if you want.
>
> 4/5 in fact is independent and can be pushed.
I would prefer to maintain consistence and avoid trying to figure out in
which order should I apply the patches to actually test it. So If I get it
right, I need to apply v2 patch 1 and patch2, v3 patch 1 to 4, and finally
v2 patch 5?