This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h

From: Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Martin Sebor <msebor at redhat dot com>, Stefan Liebler <stli at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:08:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Authentication-results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=triegel at redhat dot com
Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com C342A81227
Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com C342A81227
References: <1490103612-9401-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703211623480.8480@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <662cb906-1845-1164-5b61-a575c5edfe07@linaro.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703211644540.8480@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <1490606755.26906.423.camel@redhat.com> <5a09c4f0-f0cc-7252-110d-8443533e1e98@gmail.com>

On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 10:10 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> I've reviewed the DRs and your comments below.  I agree with
> your view and just for clarity provide some additional comments
> of my own.

Thanks!

> There's been a lot of talk over the last few WG14 meetings about
> the whole threads section needing an overhaul.  I don't know if
> anyone is actually working on it but if it were to happen (for
> C2X) there is some risk that an implementation coded to the C11
> spec not conforming to the cleaned up and improved C2X spec.

I'd hope that they wouldn't deviate from what C++ specifies.  I'm
monitoring C++ changes, including whether anything would result in
required changes for glibc.  IOW, if C doesn't deviate from C++, we
shouldn't need additional changes just for C.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella

References:
- [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h
  - From: Torvald Riegel
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h
  - From: Martin Sebor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]