This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Static application with --dynamic-list crashes


On 15/03/17 09:43, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Mär 15 2017, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 15/03/17 09:29, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> On Mär 15 2017, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 15/03/17 08:59, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>>>> On Mär 15 2017, Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> when a gdbserver is linked statically,
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you doing that?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> it is useful for debugging a system
>>>> with broken libc and ssh access only
>>>> (so gdbserver does not work)
>>>
>>> Why does it help if it needs it anyway?
>>>
>>
>> static linked gdb does not need libc
> 
> ??? The OP says otherwise.
> 

that is a regression, it used to work fine.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]