This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Get rid of duplicate const declaration specifier warning in tst-resolv-qtypes.c.


On 02/24/2017 10:57 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 04:13:29PM +0100, Stefan Liebler wrote:
On 01/31/2017 11:23 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Jan 31 2017, Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

static const const char *domain = "www.example.com";

domain should be const.

Andreas.

Okay.

Here is the updated patch.

Okay to commit (after release)?

Bye.
Stefan

commit 322394d80126fb540026818bb81f0df79d2fa3cf
Author: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon Jan 30 09:06:44 2017 +0100

    Get rid of duplicate const declaration specifier warning in tst-resolv-qtypes.c.

    Compiling resolv/tst-resolv-qtypes.c with GCC 7 results in:
    tst-resolv-qtypes.c:53:14: error: duplicate ‘const’ declaration specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier]
     static const const char *domain = "www.example.com";

    This patch removes the duplicate const and makes domain a const pointer
    to const char literal.

    ChangeLog:

    	* resolv/tst-resolv-qtypes.c (domain):
    	Change type to const pointer to const char.

diff --git a/resolv/tst-resolv-qtypes.c b/resolv/tst-resolv-qtypes.c
index dcb39e5..06ea3db 100644
--- a/resolv/tst-resolv-qtypes.c
+++ b/resolv/tst-resolv-qtypes.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ response (const struct resolv_response_context *ctx,
   resolv_response_close_record (b);
 }

-static const const char *domain = "www.example.com";
+static const char * const domain = "www.example.com";

 static int
 wrap_res_query (int type, unsigned char *answer, int answer_length)

Yes, this is OK.


Committed.

Thanks.
Stefan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]