This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
February 28, 2017
February 27, 2017
February 26, 2017
20:35 | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Optimize generic spinlock code and use C11 like atomic macros. | Torvald Riegel |
20:29 | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Optimize generic spinlock code and use C11 like atomic macros. | Florian Weimer |
20:06 | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Optimize generic spinlock code and use C11 like atomic macros. | Torvald Riegel |
07:56 | Re: RFC: Run libm tests separately for each function | Florian Weimer |
07:55 | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Optimize generic spinlock code and use C11 like atomic macros. | Florian Weimer |
February 25, 2017
February 24, 2017
February 23, 2017
February 22, 2017
February 21, 2017
February 20, 2017
February 19, 2017
15:40 | A note on the current state of build-many-glibcs | Zack Weinberg |
15:30 | [PATCH] One more obvious missing #include in the testsuite. | Zack Weinberg |
09:20 | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Optimize generic spinlock code and use C11 like atomic macros. | Florian Weimer |
February 18, 2017
18:23 | arch maintainers: RFC on spinlock refactoring | Torvald Riegel |
17:05 | Re: [PATCH 2/2] S390: Use generic spinlock code. | Torvald Riegel |
16:57 | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Optimize generic spinlock code and use C11 like atomic macros. | Torvald Riegel |
09:48 | [PATCH v2] Test errno setup | Yury Norov |
February 17, 2017
February 16, 2017
February 15, 2017
20:07 | [PATCH v3] aarch64: Add split-stack TCB field | Adhemerval Zanella |
16:26 | Re: [PATCH 2/2] S390: Use generic spinlock code. | Stefan Liebler |
16:26 | Re: RFC: shared-memory synchronization benchmarking in glibc | Stefan Liebler |
13:11 | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix {INLINE,INTERNAL}_SYSCALL macros for x32 | Adhemerval Zanella |
10:21 | Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: Improvements for UDP client timeout handling [BZ #20257] | Florian Weimer |
09:36 | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Optimize generic spinlock code and use C11 like atomic macros. | Stefan Liebler |
01:14 | Move most libmvec test contents from .c to .h files [committed] | Joseph Myers |
February 14, 2017
February 13, 2017
February 12, 2017
23:22 | [PATCH] powerpc: Use lwsync on 64bit | Anton Blanchard |
20:48 | Re: [PATCH v2] [BZ 21130] ldbl-128: Fix y0 and y1 for -Inf input | Gabriel F. T. Gomes |
06:01 | Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] manual: Add new header and standards annotations. | Rical Jasan |
February 11, 2017
18:24 | Re: [PATCH] New condvar implementation that provides stronger ordering guarantees. | Mike Frysinger |
18:20 | Re: [RFC PATCH] Test for syscall templates | Zack Weinberg |
14:47 | Re: [RFC PATCH] Test for syscall templates | Yury Norov |
12:38 | Re: [PATCH] New condvar implementation that provides stronger ordering guarantees. | Adhemerval Zanella |
12:17 | Re: [PATCH] New condvar implementation that provides stronger ordering guarantees. | Florian Weimer |
February 10, 2017
February 09, 2017
February 08, 2017
February 07, 2017
February 06, 2017
February 05, 2017
17:47 | 2.25 release all done | Siddhesh Poyarekar |
16:38 | The GNU C Library version 2.25 is now available | Siddhesh Poyarekar |
16:06 | glibc master open for 2.26 | Siddhesh Poyarekar |
12:37 | release_lock_lock () | Siddhesh Poyarekar |
February 04, 2017
20:28 | Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Building for SuperH fails with gcc5/6 | Alexey Neyman |
20:26 | Re: [PATCH v3] Fix build with --enable-static-nss | Alexey Neyman |
02:35 | [COMMITTED] Bug 20915: Do not initialize DTV of other threads. | Carlos O'Donell |
01:07 | Re: [PATCH] tunables: Fail tests correctly when setgid does not work | Carlos O'Donell |
February 03, 2017
15:12 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | David Miller |
13:25 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | Adhemerval Zanella |
13:15 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | Siddhesh Poyarekar |
13:14 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | Siddhesh Poyarekar |
13:11 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | Carlos O'Donell |
13:10 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | Carlos O'Donell |
13:08 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | Carlos O'Donell |
11:37 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | Siddhesh Poyarekar |
11:30 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | Adhemerval Zanella |
11:08 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | Siddhesh Poyarekar |
10:36 | Re: [PATCH] tunables: Fail tests correctly when setgid does not work | Siddhesh Poyarekar |
01:21 | Re: glibc 2.25 machine status? | David Miller |
February 02, 2017
February 01, 2017
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]