This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PR19826] fix non-LE TLS in static programs

From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 08:01:26 -0500
Subject: Re: [PR19826] fix non-LE TLS in static programs
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <or60pqngb7.fsf@livre.home> <cd6f91e1-d494-7c5e-4394-2b6bf3816471@redhat.com> <02df800f-8a00-d132-a90d-dc21c54516c0@redhat.com> <ora8c9im0m.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org> <6889f47a-f9aa-8297-9e94-b81b043a7d65@redhat.com>

On 12/06/2016 03:03 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 12/06/2016 07:56 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Dec  2, 2016, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> What's the status here?  It seems that Alexandre committed it on
>>> September 22nd, despite Torvald's objections.
>>
>> No, I committed the *first* of two patches, that I'd posted on 2016-09-20.
>> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-09/msg00365.html
> 
> I'm sorry I reconstructed the history here incorrectly.

So did I. 

My deepest apologies Alex, you did indeed have consensus from Andreas
over the first of two patches.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PR19826] fix non-LE TLS in static programs
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- Re: [PR19826] fix non-LE TLS in static programs
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PR19826] fix non-LE TLS in static programs
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PR19826] fix non-LE TLS in static programs
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]