This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add an x86 IFUNC testcase for [BZ #20019]

From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 00:09:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add an x86 IFUNC testcase for [BZ #20019]
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20161004184621.GB27454@intel.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610042122170.17011@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CAMe9rOrvz5nZZUVMq5qc_FT2g9iKzpGQ6-ydESmmm3CP5BVmJg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610042253170.17011@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CAMe9rOpzKV4oLgCrX+scC=MVH-TM_TRAcOZrLUg06L0YvEZuRw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:

> I can try __builtin_memcpy, instread of __builtin_memmove.   There are 2
> acceptable results.  One is ld.so issues an error and the other is program runs.
> On x86, ld.so issues an error.  I don't know what should happen on others.

You could make the test pass on either of those results (while failing if 
ld.so crashes).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add an x86 IFUNC testcase for [BZ #20019]
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- [PATCH 2/2] Add an x86 IFUNC testcase for [BZ #20019]
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add an x86 IFUNC testcase for [BZ #20019]
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add an x86 IFUNC testcase for [BZ #20019]
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add an x86 IFUNC testcase for [BZ #20019]
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add an x86 IFUNC testcase for [BZ #20019]
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]