This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 10/04/2016 05:34 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:On 10/04/2016 04:47 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:On 09/27/2016 07:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:Any comments? I will check it in next week if there is no objection.I'd like to backport it to 2.23 and 2.24 branches. Any objections?Just this change, or the requirement for an AVX512F-capable assembler as well?Good question. This is also needed: commit f43cb35c9b3c35addc6dc0f1427caf51786ca1d2 Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> Date: Fri Jul 1 05:54:43 2016 -0700 Require binutils 2.24 to build x86-64 glibc [BZ #20139]
That's not really backportable, I'm afraid. Our users don't expect we break builds in this way.Who are those users?
We don't know, really. But moving forward the baseline binutils requirement in a stable release really contradicts what a stable release is about.
Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |